Private Property and Labor: Seed of a New Worldview — A Textual Interpretation based on the “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844”

Xinghui Chen; Linlin Liu

doi:10.54254/2753-7080/5/2024042

Xinghui Chen^* , Linlin Liu

School of Marxism, Beijing Administration Institute

^* Corresponding author: wangans679@163.com

Published: 28 March 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/5/2024042

Abstract

In the “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844,” young Marx addressed a novel issue: whereas traditional political economists regarded private property as an object opposed to the subject, adopting a metaphysical mode of thinking characterized by subject-object opposition, Adam Smith, referred to by Engels as the “Luther” of political economy, for the first time connected private property with the subject, thereby breaking away from its previous characterization as an “objective, external” dimension, implying signs of transcending Feuerbach. However, although Adam Smith and other political economists placed private property within human nature, due to their class limitations, they effectively treated profit-seeking activities as human nature, which is essentially a negation of humanity and diverges from human essence on the level of value. Marx, in critiquing their inherited ideas, not only links labor with private property but also understands labor as genuine, a return to “the essence of humanity,” as free labor rather than alienated labor, thereby laying the groundwork for the establishment of a scientific understanding of practice.

Keywords: Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 , Private Property , Labor , New Worldview

AHR Vol.5

ISSN (Print): 2753-7080

ISSN (Online): 2753-7099

Download Cover

Article Information

Received: 27 March 2024

Published: 28 March 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/5/2024042

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Chen,X.;Liu,L. (2024). Private Property and Labor: Seed of a New Worldview — A Textual Interpretation based on the “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844”. Advances in Humanities Research,5,8-12.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: AHR Vol.5

Part of Series: Advances in Humanities Research

ISSN: 2753-7080 (Print) / 2753-7099 (Online)

Article Information

Cite this article

Data availability

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

About this Volume

Copyright & License