Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Research on Cognates: A Bibliometric Analysis

Junlong Cheng; Yu Wang

doi:10.54254/2753-7080/2024.18909

Article Information

Received: 27 November 2024

Published: 18 December 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/2024.18909

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Cheng,J.;Wang,Y. (2024). Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Research on Cognates: A Bibliometric Analysis. Advances in Humanities Research,10,57-69.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Journal

Journal: Advances in Humanities Research

Volume: Vol.10

ISSN: 2753-7080 (Print) / 2753-7099 (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Jiang, N. (2015). Six decades of research on lexical representation and processing in bilinguals. In J Schwieter (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing (pp. 29-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107447257.002

[2]Kroll, J. F., & Tokowicz, N. (2005). Models of Bilingual Representation and Processing: Looking Back and to the Future. In J. F. Kroll, & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches (pp. 531-553). New York: Oxford University Press.

[3]Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3): 175-197. doi: 10.1017/s1366728902003012

[4]Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buytenhuijs, F., Van Halem, N., Al-Jibouri, Z., De Korte, M., & Rekké, S. (2019) Multilink: a computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4): 657-679. doi:10.1017/S1366728918000287

[5]Ferré, P., Sánchez-Casas, R., Comesaña, M., & Demestre, J. (2017). Masked translation priming with cognates and noncognates: Is there an effect of words’ concreteness? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4): 770-782. doi:10.1017/s1366728916000262

[6]Francis, W. S. (2005). Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation. In J. F. Kroll, & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 251-267). New York: Oxford University Press.

[7]Lijewska, A. (2020). Cognate Processing Effects in Bilingual Lexical Access. In R Heredia & A Cieślicka (Eds.), Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution (pp. 71-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316535967.005

[8]Szubko-Sitarek, W. (2015). Multilingual lexical recognition in the mental lexicon of third language users. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

[9]Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective lexical access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92: 217-233. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.010

[10]Sudarshan, A., & Baum, S. (2019). Bilingual lexical access: A dynamic operation modulated by word-status and individual differences in inhibitory control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(3): 537-554. doi:10.1017/S1366728918000111

[11]Arana, S., Oliveira, H., Fernandes, A., Soares, A., & Comesaña, M. (2022). The cognate facilitation effect depends on the presence of identical cognates. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(4): 660-678. doi:10.1017/S1366728922000062

[12]Bultena, S., Dijkstra, T., & Van Hell, J. G. (2013). Cognate and word class ambiguity effects in noun and verb processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(9): 1350-1377. doi:10.1080/ 01690965.2012.718353

[13]Comesaña, M., Ferré, P., Romero, J., Guasch, M., Soares, A. P., García-Chico, T. (2015). Facilitative effect of cognate words vanishes when reducing the orthographic overlap: The role of stimuli list composition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3): 614-635. doi:10.1037/xlm0000065

[14]Kelley, A., & Kohnert, K. (2012). Is There a Cognate Advantage for Typically Developing Spanish-Speaking English-Language Learners? Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(2): 191-204. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0022)

[15]Li, C., & Gollan, T. H. (2018). Cognates facilitate switches and then confusion: Contrasting effects of cascade versus feedback on language selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, 44(6): 974-991. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000497

[16]Nakayama, M., Verdonschot, R. G., Sears, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2014). The masked cognate translation priming effect for different-script bilinguals is modulated by the phonological similarity of cognate words: Further support for the phonological account. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(7): 714–724. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.953167

[17]Zhang, J., Wu, C., Zhou, T., & Meng, Y. (2019). Cognate facilitation priming effect is modulated by writing system: Evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2): 553-566.. doi:10.1177/1367006917749062

[18]Poarch, G. J., & Van Hell, J. G. (2012). Cross-language activation in children’s speech production: Evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(3): 419-438. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.09.008

[19]Andras F., Rivera, M., Bajo, T., Dussias, P. E., & Paolieri, D. (2022). Cognate facilitation effect during auditory comprehension of a second language: A visual world eye-tracking study. International Journal of Bilingualism, 26(4): 405-425. doi: 10.1177/13670069211033359

[20]Bultena, S, Dijkstra T, & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). Cognate Effects in Sentence Context Depend on Word Class, L2 Proficiency, and Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6): 1214-1241. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.853090

[21]Poort, E. D., & Rodd, J. M. (2017). The cognate facilitation effect in bilingual lexical decision is influenced by stimulus list composition. Acta psychologica, 180: 52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.008

[22]Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Jurado, M. B., & Salvatierra, J. L. (2014). Cognate facilitation effect in balanced and non-balanced Spanish–English bilinguals using the Boston Naming Test. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6): 649-662. doi: 10.1177/1367006912466313

[23]Davis, C., Sánchez-Casas, R., García-Albea, J. E., Guasch, M., Molero, M., & Ferré, P. (2010). Masked translation priming: Varying language experience and word type with Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2): 137-155. doi:10.1017/S1366728909990393

[24]Bosma, E., & Nota, N. (2020). Cognate facilitation in Frisian–Dutch bilingual children’s sentence reading: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 189, 104699. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104699

[25]Cop, U., Dirix, N., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2017). Reading a book in one or two languages? An eye movement study of cognate facilitation in L1 and L2 reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4): 747-769. doi:10.1017/S1366728916000213

[26]Peeters, D., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (2013). The representation and processing of identical cognates by late bilinguals: RT and ERP effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4): 315-332. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.003

[27]Xiong, K. X., Verdonschot, R. G., & Tamaoka, K. (2020). The time course of brain activity in reading identical cognates: An ERP study of Chinese-Japanese bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 55: 100911. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100911

[28]Hsieh, M.-C., Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., & Kawashima, R. (2021). Neural Evidence of Language Membership Control in Bilingual Word Recognition: An fMRI Study of Cognate Processing in Chinese-Japanese Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 643211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg. 2021.643211

[29]Dijkstra, T., Peeters, D., Hieselaar, W., & Van Geffen, A. (2022). Orthographic and semantic priming effects in neighbour cognates: Experiments and simulations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(2): 371-383. doi:10.1017/S1366728922000591

[30]Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., Duyck, W., Welvaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1): 88-107. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.006

[31]Colomé, À., & Miozzo, M. (2010). Which words are activated during bilingual word production? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1): 96-109. doi: 10.1037/a0017677

[32]Lijewska, A., & Chmiel, A. (2015). Cognate facilitation in sentence context - translation production by interpreting trainees and non-interpreting trilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(3): 358-375. doi: 10.1080/14790718.2014.959961

[33]Van Hell, J. G., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2008). Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128(3): 431-451. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy. 2008.03.010

[34]Li, C., & Gollan, T. H. (2021). What cognates reveal about default language selection in bilingual sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 118: 104214. doi: 10.1016/j.jml. 2020.104214

[35]Dijkstra, T., Van Hell, J. G., & Brenders, P. (2015). Sentence context effects in bilingual word recognition: Cognate status, sentence language, and semantic constraint. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18: 597-613. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000388

[36]Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4): 780-789. doi: 10.3758/BF03196335

[37]Iniesta, A., Rossi, E., Bajo, M. T., & Paolieri, D. (2021). The Influence of Cross-Linguistic Similarity and Language Background on Writing to Dictation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 679956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679956

[38]Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4): 663-679. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.663

[39]Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2): 381-390. doi: 10.1037/a0014875

[40]Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2013) .Verb processing by bilinguals in sentence context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2): 237-259. doi:10.1017/s0272263 112000873

[41]Vanlangendonck, F., Peeters, D., Rueschemeyer, S., & Dijkstra, T. (2020). Mixing the stimulus list in bilingual lexical decision turns cognate facilitation effects into mirrored inhibition effects. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(4), 836-844. doi:10.1017/S1366728919000531

[42]Zhu, Y., & Mok, P. P. K. (2020). Visual recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs in two non-native languages: Evidence from Asian adult trilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 10(4): 441-470. doi: 10.1075/lab.17049.zhu

[43]von Grebmer zu Wolfsthurn, S., Robles, L. P., & Schiller, N. O. (2021a). Cross-linguistic interference in late language learners: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 221(6): 104993. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104993

[44]White, E. J., Titone, D., Genesee, F., Steinhauer, K. (2017). Phonological processing in late second language learners: The effects of proficiency and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(1): 162-183. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000620

[45]Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2018). Cognate effects on anaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(9): 1-17. doi: 10.1037/xlm 0000601

[46]Squires, L. R., Ohlfest, S. J., Santoro, K. E., & Roberts, J. L. (2020). Factors Influencing Cognate Performance for Young Multilingual Children's Vocabulary: A Research Synthesis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(4): 2170-2188. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00167

[47]Sinatra, R., Deville, P., Szell, M., Wang, D., & Baraabási, A. (2015). A century of physics. Nature Physics, 11, 791–796. doi: 10.1038/nphys3494

[48]Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1): 62-93. doi: 10.1002/smj.2002

[49]Cui, Y., Mou, J., & Liu, Y. (2018). Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research, 18: 837-868. doi:10.1007/s10660-018-9288-9

[50]Fu, Y., Wang, H., Guo, H., & Bermúdez-Margaretto, B., & Domínguez Martínez, A. (2020). What, Where, When and How of Visual Word Recognition: A Bibliometrics Review. Language and Speech, 002383092097471. doi:10.1177/0023830920974710

[51]Chen, C. M. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2): 1-40. doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0006

[52]Yu, H. Y., Zhi, Z. Z., Zhang, C. X., & Yang, H. Z. (2017). Research on literature involving zirconia-based on Pubmed database: a bibliometric analysis. Current Science, 112: 1134-1137. doi: 10.18520/cs/v112/i06/1134-1137

[53]Yang, W. C., Wang, S. F., Chen, C., Leung, H. H., Zeng, Q., & Su, X. (2022). Knowledge Mapping of Enterprise Network Research in China: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 898538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898538

[54]Jiang, J. X., & Fan, L. (2022). Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Language Experience: A Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open, 1-17. doi:10.1177/21582440211067252

[55]Li, J., & Liu, J. H. (2020). Science Mapping of Tunnel Fires: A Scientometric Analysis-Based Study. Fire Technology, 56: 2111-2135. doi: 10.1007/s10694-020-00969-z

[56]Wang, H. L., Yan, X. L., & Guo, H. N. (2018). Visualizing the knowledge domain of embodied language cognition: A bibliometric review. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(1): 21-31. doi:10.1093/llc/fqy010

[57]Chen, C. M. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3): 359-77. doi:10.1002/asi.20317

[58]Singh, V. K., Sigh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021) The journal coverage of web of science, Scopus and dimensions: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126: 5113-5142. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

[59]Danvila-del-Valle, I., Este´vez-Mendoza, C., & Lara, F. J. (2019). Human resources training: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101: 627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres. 2019.02.026

[60]Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T. J., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(89): 1-11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

[61]Van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety science, 188: 248-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011

[62]Dzikowski, P. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of born global firms. Journal of Business Research, 85: 281-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.054

[63]Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Caño, A. (2005). On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language, 94(1): 94-103. doi:10.1016/j.bandl. 2004.12.002

[64]Gollan, T. H., Fennema-Notestine, C., Montoya, R. I., & Jernigan, T. L. (2007). The bilingual effect on Boston Naming Test performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(2): 197-208. doi:10.1017/S1355617707070038

[65]Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra. M., & Guo, T. M. (2008). Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica, 128(3): 416-430. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy. 2008.02.001

[66]Carlo, M. S., August, D., Mclaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., Lively, T. J., & White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English- language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2): 188-215. doi: 10.1598/rrq.39.2.3

[67]Sampayo-Vargas, S., Cope, C. J., He, Z., & Byrne, G. J. (2013). The effectiveness of adaptive difficulty adjustments on students' motivation and learning in an educational computer game. Computers and Education, 69: 452-462. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.004

[68]Whiteside, S. P., & Marshall, J. (2001). Developmental Trends in Voice Onset Time: Some Evidence for Sex Differences. Phonetica, 58(3): 196-210. doi:10.1159/000056199

[69]Goral, M., Levy, E. S., Obler, L. K., Cohen, E. (2006). Cross-language lexical connections in the mental lexicon: Evidence from a case of trilingual aphasia. Brain and Language, 98(2): 235-247. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.05.004

[70]Gräber, S., Hertrich, I., Daum, I., Spieker, S., & Ackermann, H. (2002). Speech perception deficits in Parkinson's disease: underestimation of time intervals compromises identification of durational phonetic contrasts. Brain and Language, 82(1): 65-74. doi:10.1016/s0093- 934x(02)00002-0

[71]Antúnez, M., Mancini, S., Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., Hoversten, L. J., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2021). Cross-linguistic semantic preview benefit in Basque-Spanish bilingual readers: Evidence from fixation-related potentials. Brain and Language, 214: 104905. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104905

[72]Hameau, S., Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2021). Lexical activation in late bilinguals: effects of phonological neighbourhood on spoken word production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(4): 517-534. doi:10.1080/23273798.2020.1863438

[73]Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4): 265-269. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630240406

[74]Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K.., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H. (2010). How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3): 284-301. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.003

[75]Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K. (2009). Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological Science, 20(8): 923-927. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x

[76]Chen, C. M., Hu, Z., Liu, S., Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12: 593–608. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2012.674507

[77]Chen, C. M. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. New York: Nova Science.

[78]Duñabeitia, J. A., Ivaz, L., & Casaponsa, A. (2016). Developmental changes associated with cross-language similarity in bilingual children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(1): 16-31. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1086773

[79]Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Magnuson, J. S., Alario, F., & Costa, A. (2015). Breaking Down the Bilingual Cost in Speech Production. Cognitive Science, 40: 1911-1940. doi: 10.1111/cogs. 12315

[80]von Grebmer zu Wolfsthurn, S., Robles, L. P., Schiller, N. O. (2021b). Noun-phrase production as a window to language selection: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 162(6): 108055. doi:10. 1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108055

[81]Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5): 1057-1074. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1057

[82]Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2): 119-135. doi:10.1017/s1366728906002483

[83]Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2): 197-212. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004

[84]Casaponsa, A., Antón, E., Pérez, A., Duñabeitia, J. A. (2015). Foreign language comprehension achievement: insights from the cognate facilitation effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00588

[85]Starreveld, P. A., De Groot, A. M. B., Rossmark, B. M. M., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: Evidence from word production in sentence context. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2): 258-276. doi:10.1017/s1366 728913000308

[86]Kootstra, G. J., Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2012). Priming of code-switches in sentences: The role of lexical repetition, cognates, and language proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4): 797-819. doi:10.1017/s136672891100068x

[87]Broersma, M., Carter, D., Donnelly, K., & Konopka, A. (2019). Triggered codeswitching: Lexical processing and conversational dynamics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2): 1-14. doi:10.1017/s1366728919000014

[88]Prior, A., Degani, T., Awawdy, S., Yassin, R., & Korem, N. (2017). Is susceptibility to cross-language interference domain specific? Cognition, 165: 10-25. doi:10.1016/j.cognition. 2017.04.006

[89]Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010) Masked translation priming effects with low proficient bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 39(2): 260-275. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0004-9

[90]Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Two Words, One Meaning: Evidence of Automatic Co-Activation of Translation Equivalents. Frontiers in Psychology, 2: 1-12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00188

[91]Lee, Y., Jang, E., & Choi, W. (2018). L2-L1 Translation Priming Effects in a Lexical Decision Task: Evidence From Low Proficient Korean-English Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 267. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00267

[92]Kleinberg, J. (2002). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: ACM Press.

[93]Guo, H. (2017). Measurement of Emerging Research Field Identification: Theory, Indicators and Examples. Beijing: Science Press.

[94]Brenders, P., Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2011). Word recognition in child second language learners: Evidence from cognates and false friends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(4): 385-396. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.03.012

[95]Kroll J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 149-174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008

[96]Schepens, J., Dijkstra, T., & Grootjen, F. (2012). Distributions of cognates in Europe as based on Levenshtein distance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1): 157-166. doi:10.1017/ S1366728910000623

[97]Otwinowska, A., & Szewczyk, J. M. (2019). The more similar the better? Factors in learning cognates, false cognates and non-cognate words. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8): 974-991. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2017.1325834

[98]Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 533–550. doi:10.3758/bf03195845

[99]Cornut, C., Mahé, G., & Casalis, S. (2022). L2 word recognition in French–English late bilinguals: Does modality matter? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(1): 121-136. doi:10.1017/S1366728921000511